Quality accounts - methodology

What is Dr Foster Intelligence's aggregate score?

No single measure can provide the whole picture, and no single number can possibly capture the complexity of what hospitals do. Nonetheless, it is often useful to combine different measures to give each hospital a score.

For our quality accounts and scoring system we decided to concentrate on the area we think is most important - patient safety. We have used the relevant indicators from our quality accounts (ie the 13 indicators from the patient safety domain) and combined them using a statistical technique called z-scoring to give an overall measure of each hospital. No weighting was applied to the indicators.

The result is a score between 0 and 100, with 100 being the best. We have grouped all trusts into five bands, giving 1 for the poorest performers and 5 for the best.

The methodology identifies top and bottom performers by looking at their score for a certain measure of care and seeing how different this is to other hospitals. Those who are doing much better than the average get high scores and those who are not doing as well get low scores.

To put them in bandings, we have calculated the probability that hospitals are among the best or worst, based on their scores.

What methodology did we use?

Step 1 Produce individual z scores

Calculate z scores for each indicator. Different types of indicators have different methods of calculating a z score that are summarised below.

Based on the recommendation of the Healthcare Commission (2009), relative risk based indicators are transformed thus: Rates are transformed by subtracting the mean value for the rate then dividing by its standard deviation. Categorical data (e.g. yes/no question etc) are mapped onto a scale between -2.5 and +2.5. Before aggregating, all z scores are capped at ± 3 to stop a single extreme value dominating the aggregate score.

For this methodology to work, all indicators need to be in the form that high is bad. Therefore, z scores where this was not the case were multiplied by -1.

Step 2 - Produce aggregate z scores

The z-scores for each of the indicators were averaged to produce the domain z-score for patient safety. Missing values were excluded from the z-score. To ensure that the domain score behaves like proper z-scores, the score for each trust is transformed by subtracting the mean value and then dividing this by its standard deviation.

Step 3 - Produce Bayesian Ranking

Each indicator has an associated degree of uncertainty which must be taken into consideration if we are going to attempt to rank trusts. For instance, our example trust has an HSMR of 84.96073 with Poisson distributed 95% Confidence interval between 79.0 and 91.2. We used a statistical package called R to generate 50,000 credible estimates for each indicator for every trust. The graph below shows the distribution of HSMR scores for the example trust that were used in the ranking process.

In effect, Bayesian ranking repeatedly picks HSMRs from this distribution and sees how this changes the ranking. As it makes use of lots of random numbers it's often called a Monte Carlo procedure.

The key effect of the Bayesian ranking is to move trusts with extreme scores and wide confidence intervals towards the overall average.

In the School mark example below, the Bayesian ranking takes into account.

Each indicator has an associated degree of uncertainty to be incorporated into the Bayesian ranking in the following manner:

  • SMRs - Poisson distribution with lambda=number of deaths.
  • SARs - Poisson distribution with lambda=number of admissions.
  • Crude event rates - Depends on the rate, r;
    • If 0.1 < r< 0.9 then normal approximation to the binomial distribution,
    • If 0.1 >r or r>0.9 then Poisson distribution with lambda=number of events.
  • Crude ratio - currently the only crude ratio is the staff / bed ratio and this will be kept fixed as it is within a hospitals control.
  • Response to hospital guide questionnaire - kept fixed as they are within the hospitals control.

In their research, Marshall and Spiegelhalter (1998) used 10,000 iterations. Computing power has dramatically increased since 1998, so we used 50,000 iterations. To ensure this was sufficient, we ran the procedure for an additional 50,000 iterations and verified that the trusts in the top 10 and bottom 10 trusts remain unchanged for each domain indicator.

Output

The project brief was for each trust to be given a score and a banding for patient safety.

Scores were calculated by taking the trusts' median rank (which goes from 1 to 147) and rescaling it, so it lay between 0 and 100.

The bandings were designed to reflect the uncertainty over the ranking. Conventionally, median ranks are shown alongside a 75% credible region and perhaps the probability of a trust being in the top 10 and bottom 10 trusts. However, we were advised that this approach needed refining for a public guide.

Instead, trusts with a very high probability of being in the top and bottom 10 were allocated a 5 or 1 banding respectively. Trusts whose 75% credible region overlapped the mid point were allocated a banding of 3. The remainder were allocated a banding of 4 or 2 depending on whether their median rank was above or below the half way point.

Occasionally the Bayesian ranking process produced bandings for a trust was very much out of tune with its neighbours. When this occurred, we gave the trust the benefit of the doubt and promoted the trust up to a higher banding.

All my trust's data is defined as "within expected range" why have I been banded 1 in Dr Foster's analysis?

One important thing to note is that z scores only look at the point estimate of a trust's score (eg the HSMR value not the control limit banding) and without Bayesian ranking ignore the uncertainty about a score. In this respect they differ from our other reports that report indicators as low, within expected range and high. This effect is illustrated in the following example. A school may impose a pass mark of 50% across all exams. Moreover, the School may say that as marks are subjective, marks are only valid to the nearest 5%. Consider a student with the following marks:

  • Geography: 45% (CI 40% to 50%) - As Confidence intervals included 50% give a pass.
  • English: 45% (CI 40% to 50%) - As Confidence intervals included 50% give a pass.
  • History: 45% (CI 40% to 50%) - As Confidence intervals included 50% give a pass.
  • Overall mark - Pass

In this case the pass is the equivalent to "within expected range". However, their actual mark for every course was a fail so perhaps we might want to give them a fail, even though they were given a pass in every module.

We are happy to share the underlying data to interested parties. Please email qualityaccounts@drfoster.co.uk for access.

References

Bardsley, Spiegelhalter, Blunt, Chitnis, Roberts and Bharania (2009) 'Using Routine Intelligence to Target Inspection of Healthcare Providers in England', Qual. Saf. Health Care 2009; 18; 189-194.

Marshall and Spiegelhalter (1998), 'Reliability of League Tables of In Vitro Fertilisation Clinics: Retrospective Analysis of Live Birth Rates', BMJ 1998; 316; 1701-1704.

Healthcare Commission (2009), 'Following Up Mortality Outliers', www.cqc.org.uk downloaded 05/10/2009

Death in low-mortality CCS groups

Metric:
Number of deaths per 1,000 spells
Numerator
All spells with method of discharge is death (DISMETH=4)
Denominator:
Discharges, 18 years or older, spells related to pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium, or CCS groups with less than 0.5% mortality rate
Low mortality CCS groups
CCS group id CCS group
7 Viral infection
9 Sexually transmitted infections (not HIV or hepatitis)
46 Benign neoplasm of uterus
47 Other and unspecified benign neoplasm
57 Immunity disorders
61 Sickle cell anaemia
64 Other haematologic conditions
65 Mental retardation
66 Alcohol-related mental disorders
67 Substance-related mental disorders
72 Anxiety, somatoform, dissociative, and personality disorders
73 Preadult disorders
84 Headache, including migraine
86 Cataract
87 Retinal detachments, defects, vascular occlusion, and retinopathy
88 Glaucoma
89 Blindness and vision defects
90 Inflammation, infection of eye
91 Other eye disorders
92 Otitis media and related conditions
93 Conditions associated with dizziness or vertigo
94 Other ear and sense organ disorders
119 Varicose veins of lower extremity
120 Haemorrhoids
247 Lymphadenitis
124 Acute and chronic tonsillitis
126 Other upper respiratory infections
128 Asthma
136 Disorders of teeth and jaw
137 Diseases of mouth, excluding dental
138 Oesophageal disorders
140 Gastritis and duodenitis
141 Other disorders of stomach and duodenum
142 Appendicitis and other appendiceal conditions
143 Abdominal hernia
147 Anal and rectal conditions
198 Other inflammatory condition of skin
200 Other skin disorders
202 Rheumatoid arthritis and related disease
203 Osteoarthritis
208 Acquired foot deformities
209 Other acquired deformities
211 Other connective tissue disease
212 Other bone disease and musculoskeletal deformities
225 Joint disorders and dislocations, trauma-related
160 Calculus of urinary tract
162 Other diseases of bladder and urethra
163 Genitourinary symptoms and ill-defined conditions
164 Hyperplasia of prostate
165 Inflammatory conditions of male genital organs
166 Other male genital disorders
167 Nonmalignant breast conditions
168 Inflammatory diseases of female pelvic organs
169 Endometriosis
170 Prolapse of female genital organs
171 Menstrual disorders
172 Ovarian cyst
173 Menopausal disorders
174 Female infertility
175 Other female genital disorders
177 Spontaneous abortion
178 Induced abortion
179 Postabortion complications
180 Ectopic pregnancy
181 Other complications of pregnancy
182 Haemorrhage during pregnancy, abruptio placenta, placenta previa
183 Hypertension complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
184 Early or threatened labour
185 Prolonged pregnancy
186 Diabetes or abnormal glucose tolerance complicating pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium
187 Malposition, malpresentation
188 Fetopelvic disproportion, obstruction
189 Previous C-section
190 Foetal distress and abnormal forces of labour
191 Polyhydramnios and other problems of amniotic cavity
192 Umbilical cord complication
193 Trauma to perineum and vulva
194 Forceps delivery
195 Other complications of birth, puerperium affecting management of mother
196 Normal pregnancy and/or delivery
218 Liveborn
220 Intrauterine hypoxia and birth asphyxia
222 Haemolytic jaundice and perinatal jaundice
223 Birth trauma
214 Digestive congenital anomalies
215 Genitourinary congenital anomalies
217 Other congenital anomalies
102 Nonspecific chest pain
251 Abdominal pain
232 Sprains and strains
236 Open wounds of extremities
241 Poisoning by psychotropic agents
242 Poisoning by other medications and drugs
253 Allergic reactions
10 Immunizations and screening for infectious disease
176 Contraceptive and procreative management
256 Medical examination/evaluation
257 Other aftercare
258 Other screening for suspected conditions
Exclude cases

With any code for trauma, immunocompromised state, or cancer

See Appendix A: Codes for immunocompromised states

See Appendix B: Cancer codes

See Appendix C: Trauma diagnosis codes

Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
April 2008 - March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate per1,000
Appendix A Immunocompromised states
B24 Unspecified human immunodefiency virus [HIV] disease
B59 Pneumocystosis
D70 Agranulocytosis
D7 Functional disorders of polymorphonuclear neutrophils
D72 Genetic anomalies of leukocytes
D80 Hereditary hypogammaglobulinaemia
D80 Nonfamilial hypogammaglobulinaemia
D80 Selective deficiency of immunoglobulin A [IgA]
D80 Selective deficiency of immunoglobulin G [IgG] subclasses
D80 Selective deficiency of immunoglobulin M [IgM]
D80 Immunodefiency with increased immunoglobulin M [IgM]
D80 Other immunodefiencies with predominantly antibody defects
D81 Nezelof's syndrome
D819 Combined immunodefiency, unspecified
D82 Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome
D82 Di George's syndrome
D8 Com var immunodef with predom abn B-cell numb and funct
D8 Common var immunodef predom immunoregulatory T-cell disord
D8 Other common variable immunodefiencies
D849 immunodefiency, unspecified
D89 Other specified disorders involving the immune mechanism NEC
D899 Disorder involving the immune mechanism, unspecified
E4 Kwashiorkor
E4 Nutritional marasmus
E4 Unspecified severe protein-energy malnutrition
I12 Hypertensive renal disease with renal failure
I1 Hypertensive heart and renal disease with renal failure
I1 Hyper heart and renal dis both (cong) heart and renal fail
K91 Postsurgical malabsorption, not elsewhere classified
M 59 Systemic involvement of connective tissue, unspecified
N1 Chronic renal failure (no exact ICD1 match possible)
T86 Bone-marrow transplant rejection
T86 Kidney transplant failure and rejection
T86 Heart transplant failure and rejection
T86 Liver transplant failure and rejection
T86 Failure and reject of other transplanted organs and tissues
T869 Failure and reject of unspec transplanted organ and tissue
Z45 Adjustment and management of vascular access device
Z49 Extracorporeal dialysis
Z94 Kidney transplant status
Z94 Heart transplant status
Z94 Lung transplant status
Z94 Liver transplant status
Z94 Other transplanted organ and tissue status
Z99 Dependence on renal dialysis
Appendix B Cancer codes
Whole C chapter
D00 Carcinomata-in-situ of oral cavity oesophagus and stomach
D01 Carcinomata-in-situ of other and unspecified digestive organs
D02 Carcinomata-in-situ of middle ear and respiratory system
D03 Melanoma in situ
D04 Carcinomata-in-situ of skin
D05 Carcinomata-in-situ of breast
D06 Carcinomata-in-situ of cervix uteri
D07 Carcinomata-in-situ of other and unspecified genital organs
D09 Carcinomata-in-situ of other and unspecified sites
Z85 Personal history of malignant neoplasm
Appendix C Trauma diagnosis codes
S011 Open wound of eyelid and periocular area
S02 Fracture of vault of skull
S02 Fracture of base of skull
S02 Fracture of nasal bones
S02 Fracture of orbital floor
S02 Fracture of malar and maxillary bones
S02 Fracture of mandible
S02 Multiple fractures involving skull and facial bones
S02 Fractures of other skull and facial bones
S02 Fracture of skull and facial bones, part unspecified
S03 Dislocation of jaw
S05 Ocular lacn and rupture with prolapse or loss intraoc tiss
S05 Ocular lacn without prolapse or loss of intraocular tissue
S05 Penetrating wound of orbit with or without foreign body
S05 Penetrating wound of eyeball with foreign body
S05 Avulsion of eye
S05 Other injuries of eye and orbit
S05 Injury of eye and orbit, part unspecified
S06 Concussion
S06 Diffuse brain injury
S06 Epidural haemorrhage
S06 Traumatic subdural haemorrhage
S06 Traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage
S06 Other intracranial injuries
S07 Crushing injury of face
S09 Unspecified injury of head
S12 Fracture of first cervical vertebra
S12 Fracture of second cervical vertebra
S12 Multiple fractures of cervical spine
S12 Fracture of other parts of neck
S12 Fracture of neck, part unspecified
S13 Dislocation of cervical vertebra
S13 Multiple dislocations of neck
S14 Other and unspecified injuries of cervical spinal cord
S14 Injury of nerve root of cervical spine
S14 Injury of brachial plexus
S15 Injury of carotid artery
S15 Injury of external jugular vein
S15 Injury of internal jugular vein
S15 Injury of multiple blood vessels at neck level
S15 Injury of other blood vessels at neck level
S15 Injury of unspecified blood vessel at neck level
S17 Crushing injury of neck, part unspecified
S22 Fracture of thoracic vertebra
S22 Fracture of sternum
S22 Fracture of rib
S22 Multiple fractures of ribs
S22 Flail chest
S23 Dislocation of thoracic vertebra
S24 Other and unspecified injuries of thoracic spinal cord
S24 Injury of nerve root of thoracic spine
S25 Injury of thoracic aorta
S25 Injury of innominate or subclavian artery
S25 Injury of superior vena cava
S25 Injury of innominate or subclavian vein
S25 Injury of pulmonary blood vessels
S25 Injury of intercostal blood vessels
S25 Injury of multiple blood vessels of thorax
S25 Injury of other blood vessels of thorax
S25 Injury of unspecified blood vessel of thorax
S26 Other injuries of heart
S26 Injury of heart, unspecified
S27 Traumatic pneumothorax
S27 Traumatic haemothorax
S27 Traumatic haemopneumothorax
S27 Other injuries of lung
S27 Injury of bronchus
S27 Injury of other specified intrathoracic organs
S27 Injury of unspecified intrathoracic organ
S32 Fracture of lumbar vertebra
S32 Fracture of sacrum
S32 Fracture of ilium
S32 Fracture of acetabulum
S32 Fracture of pubis
S32 Fracture of oth and unspec parts of lumbar spine and pelvis
S33 Dislocation of lumbar vertebra
S33 Dislocation of sacroiliac and sacrococcygeal joint
S34 Other injury of lumbar spinal cord
S34 Injury of nerve root of lumbar and sacral spine
S34 Injury of cauda equina
S34 Injury of lumbosacral plexus
S35 Injury of abdominal aorta
S35 Injury of inferior vena cava
S35 Injury of coeliac or mesenteric artery
S35 Injury of portal or splenic vein
S35 Injury of renal blood vessels
S35 Injury of iliac blood vessels
S35 Inj multi blood vessels abdomen lower back and pelvis level
S35 Inj oth blood vessels abdomen lower back and pelvis level
S35 Inj of unspec blood vessel abdom low back and pelvis level
S36 Injury of spleen
S36 Injury of liver or gallbladder
S36 Injury of pancreas
S36 Injury of stomach
S36 Injury of small intestine
S36 Injury of colon
S36 Injury of rectum
S36 Injury of other intra-abdominal organs
S36 Injury of unspecified intra-abdominal organ
S37 Injury of kidney
S37 Injury of ureter
S37 Injury of bladder
S37 Injury of uterus
S37 Injury of other pelvic organs
S37 Injury of unspecified pelvic organ
S38 Crushing injury of external genital organs
S38 Crush inj oth and unspec part of abdo lower back and pelvis
S42 Fracture of clavicle
S42 Fracture of scapula
S42 Fracture of upper end of humerus
S42 Fracture of shaft of humerus
S42 Fracture of lower end of humerus
S43 Dislocation of shoulder joint
S43 Dislocation of acromioclavicular joint
S43 Dislocation of sternoclavicular joint
S43 Dislocation of other and unspec parts of shoulder girdle
S45 Injury of brachial artery
S45 Injury of axillary or brachial vein
S4 Crushing injury of shoulder and upper arm
S52 Fracture of upper end of ulna
S52 Fracture of upper end of radius
S52 Fracture of shaft of ulna
S52 Fracture of shaft of radius
S52 Fracture of shafts of both ulna and radius
S52 Fracture of lower end of radius
S52 Fracture of lower end of both ulna and radius
S52 Fracture of other parts of forearm
S52 Fracture of forearm, part unspecified
S53 Dislocation of elbow, unspecified
S55 Injury of vein at forearm level
S57 Crushing injury of elbow
S57 Crushing injury of forearm, part unspecified
S58 Traumatic amputation at elbow level
S58 Traumatic amputation at level between elbow and wrist
S62 Fracture of navicular [scaphoid] bone of hand
S62 Fracture of other carpal bone(s)
S62 Fracture of first metacarpal bone
S62 Fracture of other metacarpal bone
S62 Multiple fractures of metacarpal bones
S62 Fracture of other and unspecified parts of wrist and hand
S63 Dislocation of wrist
S63 Dislocation of finger
S65 Injury of superficial palmar arch
S65 Injury of blood vessel(s) of other finger
S67 Crushing injury of thumb and other finger(s)
S67 Crush injury other and unspecified parts of wrist and hand
S71 Open wound of hip
S72 Fracture of neck of femur
S72 Pertrochanteric fracture
S72 Subtrochanteric fracture
S72 Fracture of shaft of femur
S72 Fracture of lower end of femur
S72 Fracture of femur, part unspecified
S73 Dislocation of hip
S75 Injury of femoral artery
S75 Injury of femoral vein at hip and thigh level
S75 Injury of greater saphenous vein at hip and thigh level
S77 Crushing injury of hip with thigh
S78 Traumatic amputation of hip and thigh, level unspecified
S81 Open wound of knee
S82 Fracture of patella
S82 Fracture of upper end of tibia
S82 Fracture of shaft of tibia
S82 Fracture of fibula alone
S82 Fracture of medial malleolus
S82 Fracture of lateral malleolus
S82 Fractures of other parts of lower leg
S83 Dislocation of patella
S83 Dislocation of knee
S83 Tear of meniscus, current
S83 Tear of articular cartilage of knee, current
S85 Injury of popliteal artery
S85 Injury of (anterior)(posterior) tibial artery
S85 Injury of popliteal vein
S85 Injury of other blood vessels at lower leg level
S85 Injury of unspecified blood vessel at lower leg level
S87 Crushing injury of knee
S87 Crushing injury of other and unspecified parts of lower leg
S88 Traumatic amputation at knee level
S88 Traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle
S88 Traumatic amputation of lower leg, level unspecified
S91 Open wound of other parts of foot
S92 Fracture of calcaneus
S92 Fracture of talus
S92 Fracture of other tarsal bone(s)
S92 Fracture of metatarsal bone
S92 Fracture of foot, unspecified
S93 Dislocation of ankle joint
S93 Dislocation of toe(s)
S93 Dislocation of other and unspecified parts of foot
S95 Injury of plantar artery of foot
S95 Injury of other blood vessels at ankle and foot level
S95 Injury of unspecified blood vessel at ankle and foot level
S97 Crushing injury of ankle
S97 Crushing injury of toe(s)
S97 Crushing injury of other parts of ankle and foot
S98 Traumatic amputation of foot at ankle level
T01 Open wounds involving multiple regions of upper limb(s)
T02 Fractures involving thorax with lower back and pelvis
T02 Fractures involving multiple regions of both upper limbs
T02 Fractures involving multiple regions of both lower limbs
T03 Multiple dislocations, sprains and strains, unspecified
T04 Crush inj involv thorax with abdomen lwr back & pelvis
T04 Crushing injuries involving multiple region of upper limb(s)
T04 Crushing injuries involving multiple region of lower limb(s)
T04 Multiple crushing injuries, unspecified
T05 Traumatic amputation of both arms [any level]
T05 Traumatic amputation of both feet
T05 Traumatic amputation of both legs [any level]
T06 Inj nerves and spinal cord involving oth multi body regions
T08 Fracture of spine, level unspecified
T08 Fracture of spine, level unspecified
T09 Dislocation sprain & strain unspec joint & ligament trunk
T09 Injury of spinal cord, level unspecified
T09 inj unspec nerve spinal nerve root & plexus trunk
T10 Fracture of upper limb, level unspecified
T10 Fracture of upper limb, level unspecified
T11 Injury of unspec blood vessel of upper limb level unspec
T11 Traumatic amputation of upper limb, level unspecified
T12 Fracture of lower limb, level unspecified
T12 Fracture of lower limb, level unspecified
T13 Open wound of lower limb, level unspecified
T14 Fracture of unspecified body region
T14 Dislocation, sprain and strain of unspecified body region
T14 Injury of blood vessel(s) of unspecified body region
T14 Crush injury and traumatic amputation of unspec body region
T14 Other injuries of unspecified body region
T20 Burn of unspecified degree of head and neck
T20 Burn of first degree of head and neck
T20 Burn of second degree of head and neck
T20 Burn of third degree of head and neck
T21 Burn of unspecified degree of trunk
T21 Burn of first degree of trunk
T21 Burn of second degree of trunk
T21 Burn of third degree of trunk
T22 Burn unspec degree should and upp limb excpt wrist and hand
T22 Burn first deg of shoulder and up limb excpt wrist and hand
T22 Burn sec deg of shoulder and upr limb exc wrist/hand
T22 Burn third deg shoulder and upper limb excpt wrist and hand
T23 Burn of unspecified degree of wrist and hand
T26 Burn of eyelid and periocular area
T26 Burn of cornea and conjunctival sac
T26 Burn with resulting rupture and destruction of eyeball
T26 Burn of eye and adnexa, part unspecified
T79 Air embolism (traumatic)
T79 Fat embolism (traumatic)
T79 Traumatic secondary and recurrent haemorrhage
T79 Post-traumatic wound infection, not elsewhere classified
T79 Traumatic shock
T79 Traumatic anuria
T79 Traumatic ischaemia of muscle
T79 Traumatic subcutaneous emphysema
T79 Other early complications of trauma

Operated within 2 days

Metric
Percentage of operations performed within 2 days of admission for diagnosis of fractured neck of femur
Numerator
Spells where opdate minus admission date less than 2
Denominator
All spells with primary diagnosis of fractured neck of femur where opdate is not null
ICD10 codes
Fracture of neck of femur (hip)- S720-S722
Exclude cases
Opdate is null
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
April 2008 - March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate

Hip and Knee revision rates with manipulations

Metric

The proportion of joint replacements with a revision procedure within 365 days of the initial (index) procedure, over the total number of joint replacements carried out at the trust over a three year period.

Three years of index procedures are combined to provide sufficient numbers at trust level. A further year of data is needed to allow a year's follow-up for every index procedure. Index operations in 2005/6 to 2007/8 give rise, potentially, to revisions between 2005/6 and 2008/9.

Note that only one revision within 365 days per patient is counted (some people can have several), and revisions are matched to side of index procedure (right or left).

Construction

Index procedure codes for primary total hip replacement (THR)

Codes: oper1 in ('W371','W381','W391') or (oper1='W581' and (oper2='Z843' or oper3='Z843' or oper4='Z843'))

Description: These cover primary total replacement including resurfacing procedures. For the latter, the Z code is required in any secondary op field (oper2-oper12 - only 2 to 4 shown above for brevity) to specify hip.

Revision procedure codes for THR

Codes: oper1 in ('W373','W383','W393', 'W372','W374', 'W382','W384','W392','W394') or (oper1='W582' and (oper2='Z843' or oper3='Z843' or oper4='Z843')) or oper2 in ('W580', 'W370', 'W380', 'W390') or oper3 in ('W580', 'W370', 'W380', 'W390') or oper4 in ('W580', 'W370', 'W380', 'W390');

Description: These cover revisions (primary op field), conversions (in any secondary op field) and "attention to joint" (primary op field).

Index procedure codes for primary total knee replacement (TKR)

Codes: oper1 in ('W401','W411','W421') or (oper1='W581' and (oper2='Z846' or oper3='Z846' or oper4='Z846'))

Description: These cover primary total replacement including resurfacing procedures. For the latter, the Z code is required in any secondary op field to specify knee.

Revision procedure codes for TKR

Codes: oper1 in ('W403','W413','W423', 'W402','W404', 'W412','W414', 'W422') or ('W424' and 'Y032') or (oper1 in ('W580','W582') and (oper2='Z846' or oper3='Z846' or oper4='Z846')) or oper2 in ('W400', 'W410', 'W420') or oper3 in ('W400', 'W410', 'W420') or oper4 in ('W400', 'W410', 'W420')

Description: These cover revisions (primary op field), conversions (in any secondary op field) and "attention to joint" (primary op field).

Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame

Index procedure- April 2005 - March 2008

Revisions- April 2005 - March 2009

Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
Banding

Upper and lower control limits are calculated at 99.8% level of significance and these are used to band the crude rate.

There are three reported bands:

  1. if the crude rate of revisions is greater than the upper control limit then the assigned band is red, "more than expected"
  2. if the crude rate of revisions is less than the lower control limit then the assigned band is red, "less than expected"
  3. otherwise, the assigned band is blue, "as expected"

Median outpatient waiting time (days)

Metric
Median outpatient waiting time (days)
Calculation
Median waiting time ('Waiting' gives the period in days between the date of the appointment date and either the referral request received date (reqdate) or the DNA (did not attend) date, if given.) for each Trust.
Criteria
  • Acute specialties only (see appendix)
  • Patients referred by a General Medical Practitioner, Dentist or Dental service
  • Patients with a null or zero waiting time are excluded
  • First attendances
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
April 2008 - March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Z score
Appendix
Group id Diagnosis group
100 General Surgery
10 Urology
10 Transplantation Surgery
10 Breast Surgery
10 Colorectal Surgery
10 Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery
10 Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery
10 Vascular Surgery
110 Trauma & Orthopaedics
120 ENT
130 Ophthalmology
140 Oral Surgery
14 Restorative Dentistry
14 Orthodontics
14 Maxillo-Facial Surgery
14 Oral & Maxillo Facial Surgery
14 Endodontics
14 Periodontics
14 Prosthodontics
14 Surgical Dentistry
150 Neurosurgery
160 Plastic Surgery
16 Burns Care
170 Cardiothoracic Surgery
17 Cardiac Surgery
17 Thoracic Surgery
17 Cardiothoracic Transplantation
180 Accident & Emergency
190 Anaesthetics
19 Pain Management
19 Critical Care Medicine
14 Paediatric Dentistry
17 Paediatric Surgery
300 General Medicine
30 Gastroenterology
30 Endocrinology
30 Clinical Haematology
30 Clinical Physiology
30 Clinical Pharmacology
30 Hepatology
30 Diabetic Medicine
30 Blood And Marrow Transplantation
30 Haemophilia
310 Audiological Medicine
31 Clinical Genetics
31 Clinical Cytogenetics And Molecular Genetics
31 Clinical Immunology And Allergy
31 Rehabilitation
31 Palliative Medicine
31 Clinical Immunology
31 Allergy
31 Intermediate Care
31 Respite Care
320 Cardiology
32 Clinical Microbiology
330 Dermatology
340 Respiratory Medicine
34 Respiratory Physiology
350 Infectious Diseases
35 Tropical Medicine
360 Genito-Urinary Medicine
36 Nephrology
370 Medical Oncology
37 Nuclear Medicine
400 Neurology
40 Clinical Neuro-Physiology
410 Rheumatology
450 Dental Medicine Specialties
460 Medical Ophthalmology
32 Paediatric Cardiology
420 Paediatrics
42 Paediatric Neurology
620 GP Non-maternity
800 Clinical Oncology (previously Radiotherapy)
810 Radiology
81 Interventional Radiology
820 General Pathology
82 Blood Transfusion
82 Chemical Pathology
82 Haematology
82 Histopathology
830 Immunopathology
83 Medical Microbiology
83 Neuropathology
900 Community Medicine
90 Occupational Medicine

Number of daycase overstays

Metric
Number of daycase overstays
Numerator
Spells where management intent =2 (day case) and length of stay is greater than zero.
Denominator
All spells where management intent =2 (day case)
Exclude cases

Elective only- admission method:

  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
April 2008 - March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate

Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates- AMI

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital deaths to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
Numerator
All spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4), defined by a specific diagnosis code for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
Diagnosis group
Acute myocardial infarction- ICD10 codes: I21,I22
Denominator

Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Exclude cases
Daycases (where classpat = 2 in the first episode)
Data Source / Time frame
SUS - April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an HSMR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An HSMR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates- FNOF

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital deaths to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
Numerator
All spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4), defined by a specific diagnosis code for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
Diagnosis group
Fracture of neck of femur (hip)- ICD10 codes: S720-S722
Denominator

Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Exclude cases
Daycases (where classpat = 2 in the first episode)
Data Source / Time frame
SUS - April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an HSMR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An HSMR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates- Stroke

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital deaths to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
Numerator
All spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4), defined by a specific diagnosis code for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
Diagnosis group
Acute cerebrovascular disease- ICD10 codes: G46,I60-I64,I66
Denominator

Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Exclude cases
Daycases (where classpat = 2 in the first episode)
Data Source / Time frame
SUS - April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an HSMR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An HSMR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Standardised Readmission Ratio- Cholecystectomy

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
Numerator

All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.

Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:

  • 21, Emergency - via A&E
  • 22, Emergency - via GP
  • 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
  • 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
  • 28, Emergency - via other means

Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell

Procedure Groups-

Laparascopic cholecystectomy- OPCS codes: J183 (+ Y508 or Y75)

Other excision of gall bladder- OPCS codes: J18 (excluding J183 with Y508 or Y75)

Denominator

Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Data Source / Time frame
April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Standardised Readmission Ratio- Fracture of neck of femur

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
Numerator

All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.

Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:

  • 21, Emergency - via A&E
  • 22, Emergency - via GP
  • 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
  • 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
  • 28, Emergency - via other means

Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell

Diagnosis Group-

Fracture of neck of femur (hip)- ICD10 codes: S720-S722

Denominator

Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Data Source / Time frame
April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Standardised Readmission Ratio- Hip replacement

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
Numerator

All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.

Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:

  • 21, Emergency - via A&E
  • 22, Emergency - via GP
  • 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
  • 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
  • 28, Emergency - via other means

Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell

Procedure Group-

Hip replacement- OPCS codes: W37-W39,W93-W95

Denominator

Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Data Source / Time frame
April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Standardised Readmission Ratio- Hysterectomy

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
Numerator

All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.

Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:

  • 21, Emergency - via A&E
  • 22, Emergency - via GP
  • 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
  • 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
  • 28, Emergency - via other means

Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell

Procedure Group-

Abdominal excision of uterus- OPCS code: Q07

Vaginal excision of uterus- OPCS code: Q08

Denominator

Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Data Source / Time frame
April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Standardised Readmission Ratio- Urinary tract infections

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
Numerator

All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.

Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:

  • 21, Emergency - via A&E
  • 22, Emergency - via GP
  • 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
  • 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
  • 28, Emergency - via other means

Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell

Diagnosis Group-

Urinary tract infections- IC10 codes: N10,N11,N151,N158,N159,N16,N291,N30,N330,N34,N351,N37,N390,P393

Denominator

Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Data Source / Time frame
April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Standardised Readmission Ratio- Coronary atherosclerosis and other heart disease

Metric
The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
Numerator

All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.

Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:

  • 21, Emergency - via A&E
  • 22, Emergency - via GP
  • 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
  • 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
  • 28, Emergency - via other means

Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell

Diagnosis Group-

Coronary atherosclerosis and other heart disease- ICD10 codes: I20,I24,I251,I252,I255-I259

Denominator

Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.

Adjustments are made for:

  • Sex
  • Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
  • Admission method (non-elective or elective)
  • Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
  • Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
  • Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
  • Number of previous emergency admissions
  • Year of discharge (financial year)
  • Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
Data Source / Time frame
April 2008- March 2009
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression

The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.

Control limits

Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.

Surgical Techniques- Gall Bladder

Metric
Standardised number of patients receiving open surgery for removal of gall bladder.
Methodology

Patients that received either a Laparoscopic cholecystectomy or other excision of gall bladder were obtained over the period 2004-2008 for analysis. The following codes were used:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy OPCS codes - J183 (+ Y508 or Y75)

Other excision of gall bladder OPCS codes - J18 (excluding J183 with Y508 or Y75)

Logistic regression was applied to the data looking at the following factors:

  • Age
  • Sex
  • Deprivation (not significant in the final model)
  • Diagnosis group
  • Charlson score
  • Admission type

Admissions that did not have a valid age, sex, admission type or deprivation score were excluded from the analysis.

The diagnosis groups used in the analysis were:

Cancer of other GI organs, peritoneum - ICD10 codes: C17,C23,C24,C26,C451,C48,D014,D017,D019

Other and unspecified benign neoplasm- ICD10 codes D10-D24,D27-D36

Other nutritional, endocrine, and metabolic disorders- ICD10 codes D76,E65-E68-E74,E76,E77,E79,E80,E83,E85,E88,E898,E899,E90,R62,R631,R633-R635,R638,R760,R768,R769

Biliary tract disease- ICD10 codes K80-K83,K870,R932

Pancreatic disorders (not diabetes)- ICD10 codes B252,B263,K85,K86,K871,K903

Abdominal pain- ICD10 code R10

All other activity that did not fall into the diagnosis groups above were grouped together in a group called 'Other'.

The age groups used in the analysis were:

  • 15-24
  • 25-29
  • 30-34
  • 35-39
  • 40-44
  • 45-49
  • 50-54
  • 55-59
  • 60-64
  • 65-69
  • 70-74
  • 75-79
  • 80-84
  • Over 85's
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
April 2008 - March 2009
Basis
Acute trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression was applied to the data. Stepwise regression was carried out and no variables were removed from the model.

The data was standardised for

  • Age
  • Sex
  • Deprivation (not significant in the final model)
  • Diagnosis group
  • Charlson score
  • Admission type

Surgical Techniques- Hysterectomy

Metric
Standardised number of patients receiving an abdominal hysterectomy.
Methodology

Patients that received either an elective vaginal hysterectomy or an elective abdominal hysterectomy were obtained for analysis. The following codes were used:

Abdominal hysterectomy - OPSC code Q07

Vaginal hysterectomy - OPCS code Q08

Logistic regression was applied to the data looking at the following factors:

  • Age
  • Deprivation (not significant in the final model)
  • Diagnosis group
  • Charlson score

Admissions that did not have a valid age or deprivation score were excluded from the analysis.

The diagnosis groups used in the analysis were:

Endometriosis - ICD10 code N80

Uterine Fibroids - ICD10 code D25

Malignancies- ICD10 codes C51-C57, D06, D07

Menstrual Irregularities- ICD10 codes N92-N94

The age groups used in the analysis were:

  • 18-44
  • 45-64
  • Over 65
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
April 2008 - March 2009
Basis
Acute trust
Statistical methods used

Logistic regression was applied to the data. Stepwise regression was carried out and deprivation was not found to be significant and removed from the model.

The data was standardised for:

  • age
  • diagnosis group
  • charlson score