Quality accounts - methodology
What is Dr Foster Intelligence's aggregate score?
No single measure can provide the whole picture, and no single number can possibly capture the complexity of what hospitals do. Nonetheless, it is often useful to combine different measures to give each hospital a score.
For our quality accounts and scoring system we decided to concentrate on the area we think is most important - patient safety. We have used the relevant indicators from our quality accounts (ie the 13 indicators from the patient safety domain) and combined them using a statistical technique called z-scoring to give an overall measure of each hospital. No weighting was applied to the indicators.
The result is a score between 0 and 100, with 100 being the best. We have grouped all trusts into five bands, giving 1 for the poorest performers and 5 for the best.
The methodology identifies top and bottom performers by looking at their score for a certain measure of care and seeing how different this is to other hospitals. Those who are doing much better than the average get high scores and those who are not doing as well get low scores.
To put them in bandings, we have calculated the probability that hospitals are among the best or worst, based on their scores.
What methodology did we use?
Step 1 Produce individual z scores
Calculate z scores for each indicator. Different types of indicators have different methods of calculating a z score that are summarised below.
Based on the recommendation of the Healthcare Commission (2009), relative risk based indicators are transformed thus: Rates are transformed by subtracting the mean value for the rate then dividing by its standard deviation. Categorical data (e.g. yes/no question etc) are mapped onto a scale between -2.5 and +2.5. Before aggregating, all z scores are capped at ± 3 to stop a single extreme value dominating the aggregate score.
For this methodology to work, all indicators need to be in the form that high is bad. Therefore, z scores where this was not the case were multiplied by -1.
Step 2 - Produce aggregate z scores
The z-scores for each of the indicators were averaged to produce the domain z-score for patient safety. Missing values were excluded from the z-score. To ensure that the domain score behaves like proper z-scores, the score for each trust is transformed by subtracting the mean value and then dividing this by its standard deviation.
Step 3 - Produce Bayesian Ranking
Each indicator has an associated degree of uncertainty which must be taken into consideration if we are going to attempt to rank trusts. For instance, our example trust has an HSMR of 84.96073 with Poisson distributed 95% Confidence interval between 79.0 and 91.2. We used a statistical package called R to generate 50,000 credible estimates for each indicator for every trust. The graph below shows the distribution of HSMR scores for the example trust that were used in the ranking process.
In effect, Bayesian ranking repeatedly picks HSMRs from this distribution and sees how this changes the ranking. As it makes use of lots of random numbers it's often called a Monte Carlo procedure.
The key effect of the Bayesian ranking is to move trusts with extreme scores and wide confidence intervals towards the overall average.
In the School mark example below, the Bayesian ranking takes into account.
Each indicator has an associated degree of uncertainty to be incorporated into the Bayesian ranking in the following manner:
- SMRs - Poisson distribution with lambda=number of deaths.
- SARs - Poisson distribution with lambda=number of admissions.
- Crude event rates - Depends on the rate, r;
- If 0.1 < r< 0.9 then normal approximation to the binomial distribution,
- If 0.1 >r or r>0.9 then Poisson distribution with lambda=number of events.
- Crude ratio - currently the only crude ratio is the staff / bed ratio and this will be kept fixed as it is within a hospitals control.
- Response to hospital guide questionnaire - kept fixed as they are within the hospitals control.
In their research, Marshall and Spiegelhalter (1998) used 10,000 iterations. Computing power has dramatically increased since 1998, so we used 50,000 iterations. To ensure this was sufficient, we ran the procedure for an additional 50,000 iterations and verified that the trusts in the top 10 and bottom 10 trusts remain unchanged for each domain indicator.
Output
The project brief was for each trust to be given a score and a banding for patient safety.
Scores were calculated by taking the trusts' median rank (which goes from 1 to 147) and rescaling it, so it lay between 0 and 100.
The bandings were designed to reflect the uncertainty over the ranking. Conventionally, median ranks are shown alongside a 75% credible region and perhaps the probability of a trust being in the top 10 and bottom 10 trusts. However, we were advised that this approach needed refining for a public guide.
Instead, trusts with a very high probability of being in the top and bottom 10 were allocated a 5 or 1 banding respectively. Trusts whose 75% credible region overlapped the mid point were allocated a banding of 3. The remainder were allocated a banding of 4 or 2 depending on whether their median rank was above or below the half way point.
Occasionally the Bayesian ranking process produced bandings for a trust was very much out of tune with its neighbours. When this occurred, we gave the trust the benefit of the doubt and promoted the trust up to a higher banding.
All my trust's data is defined as "within expected range" why have I been banded 1 in Dr Foster's analysis?
One important thing to note is that z scores only look at the point estimate of a trust's score (eg the HSMR value not the control limit banding) and without Bayesian ranking ignore the uncertainty about a score. In this respect they differ from our other reports that report indicators as low, within expected range and high. This effect is illustrated in the following example. A school may impose a pass mark of 50% across all exams. Moreover, the School may say that as marks are subjective, marks are only valid to the nearest 5%. Consider a student with the following marks:
- Geography: 45% (CI 40% to 50%) - As Confidence intervals included 50% give a pass.
- English: 45% (CI 40% to 50%) - As Confidence intervals included 50% give a pass.
- History: 45% (CI 40% to 50%) - As Confidence intervals included 50% give a pass.
- Overall mark - Pass
In this case the pass is the equivalent to "within expected range". However, their actual mark for every course was a fail so perhaps we might want to give them a fail, even though they were given a pass in every module.
We are happy to share the underlying data to interested parties. Please email qualityaccounts@drfoster.co.uk for access.
References
Bardsley, Spiegelhalter, Blunt, Chitnis, Roberts and Bharania (2009) 'Using Routine Intelligence to Target Inspection of Healthcare Providers in England', Qual. Saf. Health Care 2009; 18; 189-194.
Marshall and Spiegelhalter (1998), 'Reliability of League Tables of In Vitro Fertilisation Clinics: Retrospective Analysis of Live Birth Rates', BMJ 1998; 316; 1701-1704.
Healthcare Commission (2009), 'Following Up Mortality Outliers', www.cqc.org.uk downloaded 05/10/2009
Death in low-mortality CCS groups
- Metric:
- Number of deaths per 1,000 spells
- Numerator
- All spells with method of discharge is death (DISMETH=4)
- Denominator:
- Discharges, 18 years or older, spells related to pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium, or CCS groups with less than 0.5% mortality rate
- Low mortality CCS groups
-
CCS group id CCS group 7 Viral infection 9 Sexually transmitted infections (not HIV or hepatitis) 46 Benign neoplasm of uterus 47 Other and unspecified benign neoplasm 57 Immunity disorders 61 Sickle cell anaemia 64 Other haematologic conditions 65 Mental retardation 66 Alcohol-related mental disorders 67 Substance-related mental disorders 72 Anxiety, somatoform, dissociative, and personality disorders 73 Preadult disorders 84 Headache, including migraine 86 Cataract 87 Retinal detachments, defects, vascular occlusion, and retinopathy 88 Glaucoma 89 Blindness and vision defects 90 Inflammation, infection of eye 91 Other eye disorders 92 Otitis media and related conditions 93 Conditions associated with dizziness or vertigo 94 Other ear and sense organ disorders 119 Varicose veins of lower extremity 120 Haemorrhoids 247 Lymphadenitis 124 Acute and chronic tonsillitis 126 Other upper respiratory infections 128 Asthma 136 Disorders of teeth and jaw 137 Diseases of mouth, excluding dental 138 Oesophageal disorders 140 Gastritis and duodenitis 141 Other disorders of stomach and duodenum 142 Appendicitis and other appendiceal conditions 143 Abdominal hernia 147 Anal and rectal conditions 198 Other inflammatory condition of skin 200 Other skin disorders 202 Rheumatoid arthritis and related disease 203 Osteoarthritis 208 Acquired foot deformities 209 Other acquired deformities 211 Other connective tissue disease 212 Other bone disease and musculoskeletal deformities 225 Joint disorders and dislocations, trauma-related 160 Calculus of urinary tract 162 Other diseases of bladder and urethra 163 Genitourinary symptoms and ill-defined conditions 164 Hyperplasia of prostate 165 Inflammatory conditions of male genital organs 166 Other male genital disorders 167 Nonmalignant breast conditions 168 Inflammatory diseases of female pelvic organs 169 Endometriosis 170 Prolapse of female genital organs 171 Menstrual disorders 172 Ovarian cyst 173 Menopausal disorders 174 Female infertility 175 Other female genital disorders 177 Spontaneous abortion 178 Induced abortion 179 Postabortion complications 180 Ectopic pregnancy 181 Other complications of pregnancy 182 Haemorrhage during pregnancy, abruptio placenta, placenta previa 183 Hypertension complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium 184 Early or threatened labour 185 Prolonged pregnancy 186 Diabetes or abnormal glucose tolerance complicating pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium 187 Malposition, malpresentation 188 Fetopelvic disproportion, obstruction 189 Previous C-section 190 Foetal distress and abnormal forces of labour 191 Polyhydramnios and other problems of amniotic cavity 192 Umbilical cord complication 193 Trauma to perineum and vulva 194 Forceps delivery 195 Other complications of birth, puerperium affecting management of mother 196 Normal pregnancy and/or delivery 218 Liveborn 220 Intrauterine hypoxia and birth asphyxia 222 Haemolytic jaundice and perinatal jaundice 223 Birth trauma 214 Digestive congenital anomalies 215 Genitourinary congenital anomalies 217 Other congenital anomalies 102 Nonspecific chest pain 251 Abdominal pain 232 Sprains and strains 236 Open wounds of extremities 241 Poisoning by psychotropic agents 242 Poisoning by other medications and drugs 253 Allergic reactions 10 Immunizations and screening for infectious disease 176 Contraceptive and procreative management 256 Medical examination/evaluation 257 Other aftercare 258 Other screening for suspected conditions - Exclude cases
-
With any code for trauma, immunocompromised state, or cancer
See Appendix A: Codes for immunocompromised states
See Appendix B: Cancer codes
See Appendix C: Trauma diagnosis codes
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
- April 2008 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
- Crude rate per1,000
- Appendix A Immunocompromised states
-
B24 Unspecified human immunodefiency virus [HIV] disease B59 Pneumocystosis D70 Agranulocytosis D7 Functional disorders of polymorphonuclear neutrophils D72 Genetic anomalies of leukocytes D80 Hereditary hypogammaglobulinaemia D80 Nonfamilial hypogammaglobulinaemia D80 Selective deficiency of immunoglobulin A [IgA] D80 Selective deficiency of immunoglobulin G [IgG] subclasses D80 Selective deficiency of immunoglobulin M [IgM] D80 Immunodefiency with increased immunoglobulin M [IgM] D80 Other immunodefiencies with predominantly antibody defects D81 Nezelof's syndrome D819 Combined immunodefiency, unspecified D82 Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome D82 Di George's syndrome D8 Com var immunodef with predom abn B-cell numb and funct D8 Common var immunodef predom immunoregulatory T-cell disord D8 Other common variable immunodefiencies D849 immunodefiency, unspecified D89 Other specified disorders involving the immune mechanism NEC D899 Disorder involving the immune mechanism, unspecified E4 Kwashiorkor E4 Nutritional marasmus E4 Unspecified severe protein-energy malnutrition I12 Hypertensive renal disease with renal failure I1 Hypertensive heart and renal disease with renal failure I1 Hyper heart and renal dis both (cong) heart and renal fail K91 Postsurgical malabsorption, not elsewhere classified M 59 Systemic involvement of connective tissue, unspecified N1 Chronic renal failure (no exact ICD1 match possible) T86 Bone-marrow transplant rejection T86 Kidney transplant failure and rejection T86 Heart transplant failure and rejection T86 Liver transplant failure and rejection T86 Failure and reject of other transplanted organs and tissues T869 Failure and reject of unspec transplanted organ and tissue Z45 Adjustment and management of vascular access device Z49 Extracorporeal dialysis Z94 Kidney transplant status Z94 Heart transplant status Z94 Lung transplant status Z94 Liver transplant status Z94 Other transplanted organ and tissue status Z99 Dependence on renal dialysis - Appendix B Cancer codes
-
Whole C chapter D00 Carcinomata-in-situ of oral cavity oesophagus and stomach D01 Carcinomata-in-situ of other and unspecified digestive organs D02 Carcinomata-in-situ of middle ear and respiratory system D03 Melanoma in situ D04 Carcinomata-in-situ of skin D05 Carcinomata-in-situ of breast D06 Carcinomata-in-situ of cervix uteri D07 Carcinomata-in-situ of other and unspecified genital organs D09 Carcinomata-in-situ of other and unspecified sites Z85 Personal history of malignant neoplasm - Appendix C Trauma diagnosis codes
-
S011 Open wound of eyelid and periocular area S02 Fracture of vault of skull S02 Fracture of base of skull S02 Fracture of nasal bones S02 Fracture of orbital floor S02 Fracture of malar and maxillary bones S02 Fracture of mandible S02 Multiple fractures involving skull and facial bones S02 Fractures of other skull and facial bones S02 Fracture of skull and facial bones, part unspecified S03 Dislocation of jaw S05 Ocular lacn and rupture with prolapse or loss intraoc tiss S05 Ocular lacn without prolapse or loss of intraocular tissue S05 Penetrating wound of orbit with or without foreign body S05 Penetrating wound of eyeball with foreign body S05 Avulsion of eye S05 Other injuries of eye and orbit S05 Injury of eye and orbit, part unspecified S06 Concussion S06 Diffuse brain injury S06 Epidural haemorrhage S06 Traumatic subdural haemorrhage S06 Traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage S06 Other intracranial injuries S07 Crushing injury of face S09 Unspecified injury of head S12 Fracture of first cervical vertebra S12 Fracture of second cervical vertebra S12 Multiple fractures of cervical spine S12 Fracture of other parts of neck S12 Fracture of neck, part unspecified S13 Dislocation of cervical vertebra S13 Multiple dislocations of neck S14 Other and unspecified injuries of cervical spinal cord S14 Injury of nerve root of cervical spine S14 Injury of brachial plexus S15 Injury of carotid artery S15 Injury of external jugular vein S15 Injury of internal jugular vein S15 Injury of multiple blood vessels at neck level S15 Injury of other blood vessels at neck level S15 Injury of unspecified blood vessel at neck level S17 Crushing injury of neck, part unspecified S22 Fracture of thoracic vertebra S22 Fracture of sternum S22 Fracture of rib S22 Multiple fractures of ribs S22 Flail chest S23 Dislocation of thoracic vertebra S24 Other and unspecified injuries of thoracic spinal cord S24 Injury of nerve root of thoracic spine S25 Injury of thoracic aorta S25 Injury of innominate or subclavian artery S25 Injury of superior vena cava S25 Injury of innominate or subclavian vein S25 Injury of pulmonary blood vessels S25 Injury of intercostal blood vessels S25 Injury of multiple blood vessels of thorax S25 Injury of other blood vessels of thorax S25 Injury of unspecified blood vessel of thorax S26 Other injuries of heart S26 Injury of heart, unspecified S27 Traumatic pneumothorax S27 Traumatic haemothorax S27 Traumatic haemopneumothorax S27 Other injuries of lung S27 Injury of bronchus S27 Injury of other specified intrathoracic organs S27 Injury of unspecified intrathoracic organ S32 Fracture of lumbar vertebra S32 Fracture of sacrum S32 Fracture of ilium S32 Fracture of acetabulum S32 Fracture of pubis S32 Fracture of oth and unspec parts of lumbar spine and pelvis S33 Dislocation of lumbar vertebra S33 Dislocation of sacroiliac and sacrococcygeal joint S34 Other injury of lumbar spinal cord S34 Injury of nerve root of lumbar and sacral spine S34 Injury of cauda equina S34 Injury of lumbosacral plexus S35 Injury of abdominal aorta S35 Injury of inferior vena cava S35 Injury of coeliac or mesenteric artery S35 Injury of portal or splenic vein S35 Injury of renal blood vessels S35 Injury of iliac blood vessels S35 Inj multi blood vessels abdomen lower back and pelvis level S35 Inj oth blood vessels abdomen lower back and pelvis level S35 Inj of unspec blood vessel abdom low back and pelvis level S36 Injury of spleen S36 Injury of liver or gallbladder S36 Injury of pancreas S36 Injury of stomach S36 Injury of small intestine S36 Injury of colon S36 Injury of rectum S36 Injury of other intra-abdominal organs S36 Injury of unspecified intra-abdominal organ S37 Injury of kidney S37 Injury of ureter S37 Injury of bladder S37 Injury of uterus S37 Injury of other pelvic organs S37 Injury of unspecified pelvic organ S38 Crushing injury of external genital organs S38 Crush inj oth and unspec part of abdo lower back and pelvis S42 Fracture of clavicle S42 Fracture of scapula S42 Fracture of upper end of humerus S42 Fracture of shaft of humerus S42 Fracture of lower end of humerus S43 Dislocation of shoulder joint S43 Dislocation of acromioclavicular joint S43 Dislocation of sternoclavicular joint S43 Dislocation of other and unspec parts of shoulder girdle S45 Injury of brachial artery S45 Injury of axillary or brachial vein S4 Crushing injury of shoulder and upper arm S52 Fracture of upper end of ulna S52 Fracture of upper end of radius S52 Fracture of shaft of ulna S52 Fracture of shaft of radius S52 Fracture of shafts of both ulna and radius S52 Fracture of lower end of radius S52 Fracture of lower end of both ulna and radius S52 Fracture of other parts of forearm S52 Fracture of forearm, part unspecified S53 Dislocation of elbow, unspecified S55 Injury of vein at forearm level S57 Crushing injury of elbow S57 Crushing injury of forearm, part unspecified S58 Traumatic amputation at elbow level S58 Traumatic amputation at level between elbow and wrist S62 Fracture of navicular [scaphoid] bone of hand S62 Fracture of other carpal bone(s) S62 Fracture of first metacarpal bone S62 Fracture of other metacarpal bone S62 Multiple fractures of metacarpal bones S62 Fracture of other and unspecified parts of wrist and hand S63 Dislocation of wrist S63 Dislocation of finger S65 Injury of superficial palmar arch S65 Injury of blood vessel(s) of other finger S67 Crushing injury of thumb and other finger(s) S67 Crush injury other and unspecified parts of wrist and hand S71 Open wound of hip S72 Fracture of neck of femur S72 Pertrochanteric fracture S72 Subtrochanteric fracture S72 Fracture of shaft of femur S72 Fracture of lower end of femur S72 Fracture of femur, part unspecified S73 Dislocation of hip S75 Injury of femoral artery S75 Injury of femoral vein at hip and thigh level S75 Injury of greater saphenous vein at hip and thigh level S77 Crushing injury of hip with thigh S78 Traumatic amputation of hip and thigh, level unspecified S81 Open wound of knee S82 Fracture of patella S82 Fracture of upper end of tibia S82 Fracture of shaft of tibia S82 Fracture of fibula alone S82 Fracture of medial malleolus S82 Fracture of lateral malleolus S82 Fractures of other parts of lower leg S83 Dislocation of patella S83 Dislocation of knee S83 Tear of meniscus, current S83 Tear of articular cartilage of knee, current S85 Injury of popliteal artery S85 Injury of (anterior)(posterior) tibial artery S85 Injury of popliteal vein S85 Injury of other blood vessels at lower leg level S85 Injury of unspecified blood vessel at lower leg level S87 Crushing injury of knee S87 Crushing injury of other and unspecified parts of lower leg S88 Traumatic amputation at knee level S88 Traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle S88 Traumatic amputation of lower leg, level unspecified S91 Open wound of other parts of foot S92 Fracture of calcaneus S92 Fracture of talus S92 Fracture of other tarsal bone(s) S92 Fracture of metatarsal bone S92 Fracture of foot, unspecified S93 Dislocation of ankle joint S93 Dislocation of toe(s) S93 Dislocation of other and unspecified parts of foot S95 Injury of plantar artery of foot S95 Injury of other blood vessels at ankle and foot level S95 Injury of unspecified blood vessel at ankle and foot level S97 Crushing injury of ankle S97 Crushing injury of toe(s) S97 Crushing injury of other parts of ankle and foot S98 Traumatic amputation of foot at ankle level T01 Open wounds involving multiple regions of upper limb(s) T02 Fractures involving thorax with lower back and pelvis T02 Fractures involving multiple regions of both upper limbs T02 Fractures involving multiple regions of both lower limbs T03 Multiple dislocations, sprains and strains, unspecified T04 Crush inj involv thorax with abdomen lwr back & pelvis T04 Crushing injuries involving multiple region of upper limb(s) T04 Crushing injuries involving multiple region of lower limb(s) T04 Multiple crushing injuries, unspecified T05 Traumatic amputation of both arms [any level] T05 Traumatic amputation of both feet T05 Traumatic amputation of both legs [any level] T06 Inj nerves and spinal cord involving oth multi body regions T08 Fracture of spine, level unspecified T08 Fracture of spine, level unspecified T09 Dislocation sprain & strain unspec joint & ligament trunk T09 Injury of spinal cord, level unspecified T09 inj unspec nerve spinal nerve root & plexus trunk T10 Fracture of upper limb, level unspecified T10 Fracture of upper limb, level unspecified T11 Injury of unspec blood vessel of upper limb level unspec T11 Traumatic amputation of upper limb, level unspecified T12 Fracture of lower limb, level unspecified T12 Fracture of lower limb, level unspecified T13 Open wound of lower limb, level unspecified T14 Fracture of unspecified body region T14 Dislocation, sprain and strain of unspecified body region T14 Injury of blood vessel(s) of unspecified body region T14 Crush injury and traumatic amputation of unspec body region T14 Other injuries of unspecified body region T20 Burn of unspecified degree of head and neck T20 Burn of first degree of head and neck T20 Burn of second degree of head and neck T20 Burn of third degree of head and neck T21 Burn of unspecified degree of trunk T21 Burn of first degree of trunk T21 Burn of second degree of trunk T21 Burn of third degree of trunk T22 Burn unspec degree should and upp limb excpt wrist and hand T22 Burn first deg of shoulder and up limb excpt wrist and hand T22 Burn sec deg of shoulder and upr limb exc wrist/hand T22 Burn third deg shoulder and upper limb excpt wrist and hand T23 Burn of unspecified degree of wrist and hand T26 Burn of eyelid and periocular area T26 Burn of cornea and conjunctival sac T26 Burn with resulting rupture and destruction of eyeball T26 Burn of eye and adnexa, part unspecified T79 Air embolism (traumatic) T79 Fat embolism (traumatic) T79 Traumatic secondary and recurrent haemorrhage T79 Post-traumatic wound infection, not elsewhere classified T79 Traumatic shock T79 Traumatic anuria T79 Traumatic ischaemia of muscle T79 Traumatic subcutaneous emphysema T79 Other early complications of trauma
Operated within 2 days
- Metric
- Percentage of operations performed within 2 days of admission for diagnosis of fractured neck of femur
- Numerator
- Spells where opdate minus admission date less than 2
- Denominator
- All spells with primary diagnosis of fractured neck of femur where opdate is not null
- ICD10 codes
- Fracture of neck of femur (hip)- S720-S722
- Exclude cases
- Opdate is null
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
- April 2008 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
- Crude rate
Hip and Knee revision rates with manipulations
- Metric
-
The proportion of joint replacements with a revision procedure within 365 days of the initial (index) procedure, over the total number of joint replacements carried out at the trust over a three year period.
Three years of index procedures are combined to provide sufficient numbers at trust level. A further year of data is needed to allow a year's follow-up for every index procedure. Index operations in 2005/6 to 2007/8 give rise, potentially, to revisions between 2005/6 and 2008/9.
Note that only one revision within 365 days per patient is counted (some people can have several), and revisions are matched to side of index procedure (right or left).
- Construction
-
Index procedure codes for primary total hip replacement (THR)
Codes: oper1 in ('W371','W381','W391') or (oper1='W581' and (oper2='Z843' or oper3='Z843' or oper4='Z843'))
Description: These cover primary total replacement including resurfacing procedures. For the latter, the Z code is required in any secondary op field (oper2-oper12 - only 2 to 4 shown above for brevity) to specify hip.
Revision procedure codes for THR
Codes: oper1 in ('W373','W383','W393', 'W372','W374', 'W382','W384','W392','W394') or (oper1='W582' and (oper2='Z843' or oper3='Z843' or oper4='Z843')) or oper2 in ('W580', 'W370', 'W380', 'W390') or oper3 in ('W580', 'W370', 'W380', 'W390') or oper4 in ('W580', 'W370', 'W380', 'W390');
Description: These cover revisions (primary op field), conversions (in any secondary op field) and "attention to joint" (primary op field).
Index procedure codes for primary total knee replacement (TKR)
Codes: oper1 in ('W401','W411','W421') or (oper1='W581' and (oper2='Z846' or oper3='Z846' or oper4='Z846'))
Description: These cover primary total replacement including resurfacing procedures. For the latter, the Z code is required in any secondary op field to specify knee.
Revision procedure codes for TKR
Codes: oper1 in ('W403','W413','W423', 'W402','W404', 'W412','W414', 'W422') or ('W424' and 'Y032') or (oper1 in ('W580','W582') and (oper2='Z846' or oper3='Z846' or oper4='Z846')) or oper2 in ('W400', 'W410', 'W420') or oper3 in ('W400', 'W410', 'W420') or oper4 in ('W400', 'W410', 'W420')
Description: These cover revisions (primary op field), conversions (in any secondary op field) and "attention to joint" (primary op field).
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
-
Index procedure- April 2005 - March 2008
Revisions- April 2005 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
- Crude rate
- Banding
-
Upper and lower control limits are calculated at 99.8% level of significance and these are used to band the crude rate.
There are three reported bands:
- if the crude rate of revisions is greater than the upper control limit then the assigned band is red, "more than expected"
- if the crude rate of revisions is less than the lower control limit then the assigned band is red, "less than expected"
- otherwise, the assigned band is blue, "as expected"
Median outpatient waiting time (days)
- Metric
- Median outpatient waiting time (days)
- Calculation
- Median waiting time ('Waiting' gives the period in days between the date of the appointment date and either the referral request received date (reqdate) or the DNA (did not attend) date, if given.) for each Trust.
- Criteria
-
- Acute specialties only (see appendix)
- Patients referred by a General Medical Practitioner, Dentist or Dental service
- Patients with a null or zero waiting time are excluded
- First attendances
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
- April 2008 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
- Z score
- Appendix
-
Group id Diagnosis group 100 General Surgery 10 Urology 10 Transplantation Surgery 10 Breast Surgery 10 Colorectal Surgery 10 Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery 10 Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery 10 Vascular Surgery 110 Trauma & Orthopaedics 120 ENT 130 Ophthalmology 140 Oral Surgery 14 Restorative Dentistry 14 Orthodontics 14 Maxillo-Facial Surgery 14 Oral & Maxillo Facial Surgery 14 Endodontics 14 Periodontics 14 Prosthodontics 14 Surgical Dentistry 150 Neurosurgery 160 Plastic Surgery 16 Burns Care 170 Cardiothoracic Surgery 17 Cardiac Surgery 17 Thoracic Surgery 17 Cardiothoracic Transplantation 180 Accident & Emergency 190 Anaesthetics 19 Pain Management 19 Critical Care Medicine 14 Paediatric Dentistry 17 Paediatric Surgery 300 General Medicine 30 Gastroenterology 30 Endocrinology 30 Clinical Haematology 30 Clinical Physiology 30 Clinical Pharmacology 30 Hepatology 30 Diabetic Medicine 30 Blood And Marrow Transplantation 30 Haemophilia 310 Audiological Medicine 31 Clinical Genetics 31 Clinical Cytogenetics And Molecular Genetics 31 Clinical Immunology And Allergy 31 Rehabilitation 31 Palliative Medicine 31 Clinical Immunology 31 Allergy 31 Intermediate Care 31 Respite Care 320 Cardiology 32 Clinical Microbiology 330 Dermatology 340 Respiratory Medicine 34 Respiratory Physiology 350 Infectious Diseases 35 Tropical Medicine 360 Genito-Urinary Medicine 36 Nephrology 370 Medical Oncology 37 Nuclear Medicine 400 Neurology 40 Clinical Neuro-Physiology 410 Rheumatology 450 Dental Medicine Specialties 460 Medical Ophthalmology 32 Paediatric Cardiology 420 Paediatrics 42 Paediatric Neurology 620 GP Non-maternity 800 Clinical Oncology (previously Radiotherapy) 810 Radiology 81 Interventional Radiology 820 General Pathology 82 Blood Transfusion 82 Chemical Pathology 82 Haematology 82 Histopathology 830 Immunopathology 83 Medical Microbiology 83 Neuropathology 900 Community Medicine 90 Occupational Medicine
Number of daycase overstays
- Metric
- Number of daycase overstays
- Numerator
- Spells where management intent =2 (day case) and length of stay is greater than zero.
- Denominator
- All spells where management intent =2 (day case)
- Exclude cases
-
Elective only- admission method:
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
- April 2008 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
- Crude rate
Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates- AMI
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital deaths to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
- All spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4), defined by a specific diagnosis code for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
- Diagnosis group
- Acute myocardial infarction- ICD10 codes: I21,I22
- Denominator
-
Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Exclude cases
- Daycases (where classpat = 2 in the first episode)
- Data Source / Time frame
- SUS - April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an HSMR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An HSMR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates- FNOF
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital deaths to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
- All spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4), defined by a specific diagnosis code for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
- Diagnosis group
- Fracture of neck of femur (hip)- ICD10 codes: S720-S722
- Denominator
-
Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Exclude cases
- Daycases (where classpat = 2 in the first episode)
- Data Source / Time frame
- SUS - April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an HSMR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An HSMR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates- Stroke
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital deaths to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
- All spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4), defined by a specific diagnosis code for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
- Diagnosis group
- Acute cerebrovascular disease- ICD10 codes: G46,I60-I64,I66
- Denominator
-
Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Exclude cases
- Daycases (where classpat = 2 in the first episode)
- Data Source / Time frame
- SUS - April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an HSMR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An HSMR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Standardised Readmission Ratio- Cholecystectomy
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
-
All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.
Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:
- 21, Emergency - via A&E
- 22, Emergency - via GP
- 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
- 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
- 28, Emergency - via other means
Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell
Procedure Groups-
Laparascopic cholecystectomy- OPCS codes: J183 (+ Y508 or Y75)
Other excision of gall bladder- OPCS codes: J18 (excluding J183 with Y508 or Y75)
- Denominator
-
Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Data Source / Time frame
- April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Standardised Readmission Ratio- Fracture of neck of femur
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
-
All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.
Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:
- 21, Emergency - via A&E
- 22, Emergency - via GP
- 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
- 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
- 28, Emergency - via other means
Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell
Diagnosis Group-
Fracture of neck of femur (hip)- ICD10 codes: S720-S722
- Denominator
-
Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Data Source / Time frame
- April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Standardised Readmission Ratio- Hip replacement
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
-
All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.
Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:
- 21, Emergency - via A&E
- 22, Emergency - via GP
- 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
- 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
- 28, Emergency - via other means
Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell
Procedure Group-
Hip replacement- OPCS codes: W37-W39,W93-W95
- Denominator
-
Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Data Source / Time frame
- April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Standardised Readmission Ratio- Hysterectomy
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
-
All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.
Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:
- 21, Emergency - via A&E
- 22, Emergency - via GP
- 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
- 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
- 28, Emergency - via other means
Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell
Procedure Group-
Abdominal excision of uterus- OPCS code: Q07
Vaginal excision of uterus- OPCS code: Q08
- Denominator
-
Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Data Source / Time frame
- April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Standardised Readmission Ratio- Urinary tract infections
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
-
All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.
Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:
- 21, Emergency - via A&E
- 22, Emergency - via GP
- 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
- 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
- 28, Emergency - via other means
Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell
Diagnosis Group-
Urinary tract infections- IC10 codes: N10,N11,N151,N158,N159,N16,N291,N30,N330,N34,N351,N37,N390,P393
- Denominator
-
Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Data Source / Time frame
- April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Standardised Readmission Ratio- Coronary atherosclerosis and other heart disease
- Metric
- The ratio of the observed number of readmissions to the expected number of readmissions, multiplied by 100.
- Numerator
-
All spells with an emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge.
Readmitting episode- Emergency admissions:
- 21, Emergency - via A&E
- 22, Emergency - via GP
- 23, Emergency - via Bed Bureau
- 24, Emergency - via Out-patient clinic
- 28, Emergency - via other means
Readmission date within 28 days of discharging spell
Diagnosis Group-
Coronary atherosclerosis and other heart disease- ICD10 codes: I20,I24,I251,I252,I255-I259
- Denominator
-
Expected number of readmission derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for differences in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary diagnosis (based on the Clinical Classification System - CCS group)
- Co-morbidities (based on Charlson Score)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Data Source / Time frame
- April 2008- March 2009
- Basis
- Acute Trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has a SRR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. A SRR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected were readmitted.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display 'common-cause variation'; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display 'special-cause variation' - that is, where the trust's rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Surgical Techniques- Gall Bladder
- Metric
- Standardised number of patients receiving open surgery for removal of gall bladder.
- Methodology
-
Patients that received either a Laparoscopic cholecystectomy or other excision of gall bladder were obtained over the period 2004-2008 for analysis. The following codes were used:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy OPCS codes - J183 (+ Y508 or Y75)
Other excision of gall bladder OPCS codes - J18 (excluding J183 with Y508 or Y75)
Logistic regression was applied to the data looking at the following factors:
- Age
- Sex
- Deprivation (not significant in the final model)
- Diagnosis group
- Charlson score
- Admission type
Admissions that did not have a valid age, sex, admission type or deprivation score were excluded from the analysis.
The diagnosis groups used in the analysis were:
Cancer of other GI organs, peritoneum - ICD10 codes: C17,C23,C24,C26,C451,C48,D014,D017,D019
Other and unspecified benign neoplasm- ICD10 codes D10-D24,D27-D36
Other nutritional, endocrine, and metabolic disorders- ICD10 codes D76,E65-E68-E74,E76,E77,E79,E80,E83,E85,E88,E898,E899,E90,R62,R631,R633-R635,R638,R760,R768,R769
Biliary tract disease- ICD10 codes K80-K83,K870,R932
Pancreatic disorders (not diabetes)- ICD10 codes B252,B263,K85,K86,K871,K903
Abdominal pain- ICD10 code R10
All other activity that did not fall into the diagnosis groups above were grouped together in a group called 'Other'.
The age groups used in the analysis were:
- 15-24
- 25-29
- 30-34
- 35-39
- 40-44
- 45-49
- 50-54
- 55-59
- 60-64
- 65-69
- 70-74
- 75-79
- 80-84
- Over 85's
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
- April 2008 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression was applied to the data. Stepwise regression was carried out and no variables were removed from the model.
The data was standardised for
- Age
- Sex
- Deprivation (not significant in the final model)
- Diagnosis group
- Charlson score
- Admission type
Surgical Techniques- Hysterectomy
- Metric
- Standardised number of patients receiving an abdominal hysterectomy.
- Methodology
-
Patients that received either an elective vaginal hysterectomy or an elective abdominal hysterectomy were obtained for analysis. The following codes were used:
Abdominal hysterectomy - OPSC code Q07
Vaginal hysterectomy - OPCS code Q08
Logistic regression was applied to the data looking at the following factors:
- Age
- Deprivation (not significant in the final model)
- Diagnosis group
- Charlson score
Admissions that did not have a valid age or deprivation score were excluded from the analysis.
The diagnosis groups used in the analysis were:
Endometriosis - ICD10 code N80
Uterine Fibroids - ICD10 code D25
Malignancies- ICD10 codes C51-C57, D06, D07
Menstrual Irregularities- ICD10 codes N92-N94
The age groups used in the analysis were:
- 18-44
- 45-64
- Over 65
- Data Source
- SUS - CDS
- Time frame
- April 2008 - March 2009
- Basis
- Acute trust
- Statistical methods used
-
Logistic regression was applied to the data. Stepwise regression was carried out and deprivation was not found to be significant and removed from the model.
The data was standardised for:
- age
- diagnosis group
- charlson score
